RAILWAY NATIONALISATION
NOW!
A substantial majority of voters have long taken the view
that Britain’s railways should be restored to public ownership. Privatisation has been an expensive folly and
vast sums of public and fare-payers’ money are still being poured into the
industry and into the pockets of franchisees, private corporate contractors and
lawyers.
Sir Roy McNulty in his report commissioned by the last
Labour government concluded that Britain’s railways were up to 40% more
expensive to run than the publicly owned and integrated railway industries on
the Continent of Europe. These excessive
costs have arisen since privatisation.
By contrast, the former, and much maligned and unfairly criticised
British Rail had the highest level of productivity of any railway in
Europe. This was due in large part to
the decades of under-funding by successive governments who believed the
railways were in terminal decline and that the motor car was the future for
personal travel. A former railway
regulator of the newly privatised industry said that British Rail had “worked
miracles on a pittance” and that the railways had been handed over to the
privateers “in good order”. The Beeching
cuts and a desperate lack of investment had savagely damaged our railways, but
despite that the dedication of BR staff at every level had kept them
functioning.
It has at last been properly recognised that the railways
are a major transport mode for the future, not an historic relic. It is time to rebuild an integrated railway
industry in national public ownership, properly accountable to the electorate
and to railway users through Parliament.
The emphasis on national public ownership is deliberate,
because the greatest nonsense of all is that our railway services are now
largely owned and operated by foreign nationalised railways, by foreign
governments, so that British taxpayers and fare-payers are actually subsidizing
continental taxpayers and railway passengers.
Railways are a vital national asset, but like equally vital
roads they have to be funded to a significant degree by the public purse. It is therefore illogical to contract out its
operations and then use public money both to keep services running and also pay
profits to these external organisations.
If the railways were commercial entities able to make profits without
subsidy and were not a vital component of our national infrastructure, some
kind of case for them being in the private sector might be made, at least by
the Tories. But pouring vast sums of
taxpayers and fare-payers cash into the pockets of the foreign owners of our
railways is simply stupid and driven only by dogma.
Despite the government’s feeble claims that privatisation
has been a success, the railway infrastructure has already in effect been
returned by stages to public ownership.
The disaster that was Railtrack forced Labour to establish Network Rail,
and the Tory/Lib Dem coalition have recently put Network Rail’s debts on the
public accounts. The railway tracks are
now in public ownership so are in effect nationalised.
The train operating franchises however are still
“privatised”, although it has been explained above that they are largely in
foreign public ownership. The rolling stock
is privately owned, by the so-called ROSCOS, which belong to the banks. Rolling stock is thus leased to the train
operating companies (TOCs) at exorbitant rates, another nonsense.
Transferring all the franchises to a new public railway
corporation would cost nothing and indeed save large sums for the public purse. This has been demonstrated by the East Coast
Mainline franchise which has been in the public sector for several years,
although now being reprivatized by the Tories.
The only cost of deprivatisation would therefore be the rolling stock, but
the ROSCOS have made such profits out of the railway industry that only minimal
compensation could ever be justified.
Labour should take the bull by the horns and commit to
creating a publicly owned railway. Such
a promise would be sensible, economic and enormously popular with voters. There is nothing to lose and everything to
gain.
In an ideal world, railways should perhaps be nationalised. But is it a priority? Nationalisation is not error-free. The best thing might be to consider each franchise on its merits as it comes up, but a wholesale upturning is not called for now.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the greatest socialist transport need? A good long-distance bus service, I would say - calling in at motorway service stations and with good shared-taxi shuttles into local towns. Free bus-passes for all might be another - similar to that given to oldies at present. Meanwhile, retail fuel should be tripled in price, with the extra tax going to improve public transport.
And dump the socialist case for HS2! Use longer trains instead. The Liverpool-Hull link is far more important, and will bring increased employment to a part of the country that needs it.
One of the biggest disasters of the early 1990s was the decision of Major and the Tories to privatise the railways.
ReplyDeleteHowever, for all your eloquence, Kevin, is today's Labour Party advocating that they be renationalised?
Not that I'm aware of! In fact, I'm sure the Labour leadership would recoil in horror even at the mere suggestion of it.
Also, it's hard to believe that Blair / Brown and New Labour would not have privatised the railways during their 13 long years in power, had the Tories not already done so.
After all, New Labour privatised everything else.